Downloads

https://doi.org/10.53941/rmd.2025.100007
Vasilev, O., Campbell , D., & Jaarsma, R. L. Natural Materials in Regenerative Orthopaedics: A Historical Perspective. Regenerative Medicine and Dentistry. 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.53941/rmd.2025.100007
Volume 2, Issue 2, 2025
Copyright (c) 2025 by the authors.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Review

Natural Materials in Regenerative Orthopaedics: A Historical Perspective

Olivia Vasilev 1,*, David Campbell 2,3 and Ruurd L. Jaarsma 4

1 Endeavour College, Mawson Lakes, Adelaide 5095, Australia

2 Centre of Orthopaedics and Trauma Research, University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5000, Australia

3 Wakefield Orthopaedic Clinic, 120 Angus Street, Adelaide 5000, Australia

4 Department of Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery, Flinders University and Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide 5042, Australia

* Correspondence: olivia.vasilev@endeavour.sa.edu.au

Received: 18 March 2025; Revised: 31 March 2025; Accepted: 3 April 2025; Published: 16 April 2025

Abstract: The use of natural materials in regenerative orthopaedics has undergone significant evolution over many centuries. What began as the use of simple animal sinews and plant fibers for stabilizing fractures has now expanded into sophisticated biomaterials that are integral to modern regenerative medicine. Natural substances like collagen, silk fibroin, chitosan, and cellulose are now crucial in tissue engineering, providing innovative bone and cartilage regeneration solutions. Despite their promise, natural materials face challenges such as mechanical limitations, biodegradation rates, and immunogenicity. Additionally, advancements in 3D printing allow for the replacement of complex bone defects, particularly in trauma and tumour cases, but these remain non-biological solutions that lack permanent integration with host tissues. The emergence of hybrid materials—combining natural and synthetic components—offers new opportunities to enhance biomechanical properties and biocompatibility. Furthermore, emerging technologies such as gene editing and bioactive scaffolds are paving the way for more personalized and regenerative approaches. In this review paper, we will explore the historical progression of natural materials, their current applications, and the challenges that must be overcome to maximize their therapeutic potential in orthopaedic regenerative medicine. Ethical and sustainability considerations are also discussed. The review concludes with the authors’ vision for the future of the field.

Keywords:

natural materials tissue regeneration orthopaedics 3D printing bone cartilage

References

  1. Marin, E.; Boschetto, F.; Pezzotti, G. Biomaterials and biocompatibility: An historical overview. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2020, 108, 1617–1633.
  2. Major, E.A.M. Ancient Civilisations. Trans. Newcom. Soc. 1929, 10, 69–85.
  3. Mobasheri, A. Intersection of inflammation and herbal medicine in the treatment of osteoarthritis. Curr. Rheumatol. Rep. 2012, 14, 604–616.
  4. Marin, E. History of dental biomaterials: Biocompatibility, durability and still open challenges. Herit. Sci. 2023, 11, 207.
  5. Li, P.; Yang, Z.; Jiang, L.; et al. An exploration of the origin and flow of the development of traditional Chinese medicine orthopedic and chiropractic massage. Hist. Philos. Med. 2024, 6, 15.
  6. Hoptioncann, E. Revolution in Byzantine Orthopedics. Dumbart. Oaks Pap. 2024, 78, 49–80.
  7. Kargozar, S.; Ramakrishna, S.; Mozafari, M. Chemistry of biomaterials: Future prospects. Curr. Opin. Biomed. Eng. 2019, 10, 181–190.
  8. Nather, A.; Zheng, S. Evolution of allograft transplantation. In Allograft Procurement, Processing and Transplantation: A Comprehensive Guide for Tissue Bank; World Scientific: Singapore, 2010; Volume 1.
  9. Boukraâ, L. Honey in Traditional and Modern Medicine; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2023.
  10. Rubežić, M.Z.; Krstić, A.B.; Stanković, H.Z.; et al. Different types of biomaterials: Structure and application: A short review. Adv. Technol. 2020, 9, 69–79.
  11. Molan, P.; Betts, J. Clinical usage of honey as a wound dressing: An update. J. Wound Care 2004, 13, 353–356.
  12. Fatima, N.; Anwar, S.; Jaffar, S.; et al. An insight into animal and plant halal ingredients used in cosmetics. Int. J. Innov. Creat. Chang. 2020, 14, 2020.
  13. Murray, M.M.; Spindler, K.P.; Devin, C.; et al. Use of a collagen-platelet rich plasma scaffold to stimulate healing of a central defect in the canine ACL. J. Orthop. Res. 2006, 24, 820–830.
  14. Bertin, I.; Martín-Seijo, M.; Martínez-Sevilla, F.; et al. First evidence of early neolithic archery from Cueva de los Murciélagos (Albuñol, Granada) revealed through combined chemical and morphological analysis. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 29247.
  15. Fess, E.E. A history of splinting: To understand the present, view the past. J. Hand Ther. 2002, 15, 97–132.
  16. Holland, C.; Numata, K.; Rnjak-Kovacina, J.; et al. The biomedical use of silk: Past, present, future. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2019, 8, 1800465.
  17. Salhi, A.; Letissier, H.; Salem, D.B.; et al. Shoulder anatomy, function, and modeling: Current state of the art as foreseen by Leonardo da Vinci. In Léonard de Vinci; L’Harmattan: Paris, France, 2022.
  18. Savoia, P. Nature or artifice? Grafting in early modern surgery and agronomy. J. Hist. Med. Allied Sci. 2017, 72, 67–86.
  19. Steinwachs, M.; Peterson, L.; Bobic, V.; et al. Cell-Seeded Collagen Matrix–Supported Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation (ACT-CS) A Consensus Statement on Surgical Technique. Cartilage 2012, 3, 5–12.
  20. Wang, H.-L.; Carroll, W.J. Guided bone regeneration using bone grafts and collagen membranes. Quintessence Int. 2001, 32, 504.
  21. Wang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Dong, Y. Collagen-based biomaterials for tissue engineering. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2023, 9, 1132–1150.
  22. Eynon-Lewis, N.; Ferry, D.; Pearse, M. Themistocles Gluck: An unrecognised genius. BMJ Br. Med. J. 1992, 305, 1534.
  23. Roberts, T.T.; Rosenbaum, A.J. Bone grafts, bone substitutes and orthobiologics: The bridge between basic science and clinical advancements in fracture healing. Organogenesis 2012, 8, 114–124.
  24. Larson, E. Innovations in health care: Antisepsis as a case study. Am. J. Public Health 1989, 79, 92–99.
  25. Schlich, T. Farmer to industrialist: Lister’s antisepsis and the making of modern surgery in Germany. Notes Rec. R. Soc. 2013, 67, 245–260.
  26. Baldwin, P.; Li, D.J.; Auston, D.A.; et al. Autograft, allograft, and bone graft substitutes: Clinical evidence and indications for use in the setting of orthopaedic trauma surgery. J. Orthop. Trauma 2019, 33, 203–213.
  27. Markatos, K.; Tsoucalas, G.; Sgantzos, M. Hallmarks in the history of orthopaedic implants for trauma and joint replacement. Acta Med.-Hist. Adriat. 2016, 14, 161–176.
  28. Walter, N.; Stich, T.; Docheva, D.; et al. Evolution of implants and advancements for osseointegration: A narrative review. Injury 2022, 53, S69-S73.
  29. Tian, L.; Tang, N.; Ngai, T.; et al. Hybrid fracture fixation systems developed for orthopaedic applications: A general review. J. Orthop. Transl. 2019, 16, 1–13.
  30. Kasoju, N.; Bora, U. Silk fibroin in tissue engineering. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2012, 1, 393–412.
  31. Cheng, G.; Davoudi, Z.; Xing, X.; et al. Advanced silk fibroin biomaterials for cartilage regeneration. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 4, 2704–2715.
  32. Kambe, Y. Functionalization of silk fibroin-based biomaterials for tissue engineering. Polym. J. 2021, 53, 1345–1351.
  33. Magalhaes, R.; Atala, A. Regenerative Medicine and Tissue Engineering Technologies; IIF Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2021; Volume 93.
  34. Wahl, D.; Czernuszka, J. Collagen-hydroxyapatite composites for hard tissue repair. Eur. Cell Mater. 2006, 11, 43–56.
  35. Li, L.; Yu, F.; Zheng, L.; et al. Natural hydrogels for cartilage regeneration: Modification, preparation and application. J. Orthop. Transl. 2019, 17, 26–41.
  36. Hayes, A.J.; Melrose, J. Glycosaminoglycan and proteoglycan biotherapeutics in articular cartilage protection and repair strategies: Novel approaches to visco-supplementation in orthobiologics. Adv. Ther. 2019, 2, 1900034.
  37. Agrawal, C.M. Biodegradable polymers for orthopaedic applications. In Polymer Based Systems on Tissue Engineering, Replacement and Regeneration; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2002; pp. 25–36.
  38. Athanasiou, K.A.; Niederauer, G.G.; Agrawal, C.M. Sterilization, toxicity, biocompatibility and clinical applications of polylactic acid/polyglycolic acid copolymers. Biomaterials 1996, 17, 93–102.
  39. Morris, H.; Murray, R. The Development of Textiles in Medicine and the Healthcare Environment over Time. In Medical Textiles; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2021; pp. 5–34.
  40. Ma, B.; Xie, J.; Jiang, J.; et al. Rational design of nanofiber scaffolds for orthopedic tissue repair and regeneration. Nanomedicine 2013, 8, 1459–1481.
  41. Warnecke, D.; Stein, S.; Haffner-Luntzer, M.; et al. Biomechanical, structural and biological characterisation of a new silk fibroin scaffold for meniscal repair. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2018, 86, 314–324.
  42. Mathew, A.P.; Oksman, K.; Pierron, D.; et al. Biocompatible fibrous networks of cellulose nanofibres and collagen crosslinked using genipin: Potential as artificial ligament/tendons. Macromol. Biosci. 2013, 13, 289–298.
  43. Vedula, S.S.; Yadav, G.D. Chitosan-based membranes preparation and applications: Challenges and opportunities. J. Indian Chem. Soc. 2021, 98, 100017.
  44. Tamplenizza, M.; Tocchio, A.; Gerges, I.; et al. In vivo imaging study of angiogenesis in a channelized porous scaffold. Mol. Imaging 2015, 14, 7290.
  45. Xiao, M.; Yao, J.; Shao, Z.; et al. Silk-Based 3D Porous Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2024, 10, 2827–2840.
  46. Li, C.; Hotz, B.; Ling, S.; et al. Regenerated silk materials for functionalized silk orthopedic devices by mimicking natural processing. Biomaterials 2016, 110, 24–33.
  47. Farokhi, M.; Mottaghitalab, F.; Samani, S.; et al. Silk fibroin/hydroxyapatite composites for bone tissue engineering. Biotechnol. Adv. 2018, 36, 68–91.
  48. Fitzpatrick, V.; Martín-Moldes, Z.; Deck, A.; et al. Functionalized 3D-printed silk-hydroxyapatite scaffolds for enhanced bone regeneration with innervation and vascularization. Biomaterials 2021, 276, 120995.
  49. Wang, Z.; Dadpour, S. Novel applications of collagen in tissue engineering and wound healing: New horizons. Micro Nano Bio Asp. 2024, 3, 21–26.
  50. Hogan, K.J. Development of Extracellular Matrix-Based Biomaterials for Musculoskeletal Tissue Engineering. Rice University, 2023.
  51. Amini, A.A.; Nair, L.S. Injectable hydrogels for bone and cartilage repair. Biomed. Mater. 2012, 7, 024105.
  52. Peptu, C.; Humelnicu, A.C.; Rotaru, R.; et al. Chitosan-based drug delivery systems. In Chitin and Chitosan: Properties and Applications; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 259–289.
  53. Yilmaz, I.; Gokay, N.; Gokce, A.; et al. A novel designed chitosan based hydrogel which is capable of consecutively controlled release of TGF-Beta 1 and BMP-7. Turk. Klin. J. Med. Sci 2013, 33, 18–32.
  54. Yousefiasl, S.; Sharifi, E.; Salahinejad, E.; et al. Bioactive 3D-printed chitosan-based scaffolds for personalized craniofacial bone tissue engineering. Eng. Regen. 2023, 4, 1–11.
  55. Abinaya, B.; Prasith, T.P.; Ashwin, B.; et al. Chitosan in surface modification for bone tissue engineering applications. Biotechnol. J. 2019, 14, 1900171.
  56. Caplan, A.I. New era of cell-based orthopedic therapies. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 2009, 15, 195–200.
  57. Ringe, J.; Kaps, C.; Burmester, G.-R.; et al. Stem cells for regenerative medicine: Advances in the engineering of tissues and organs. Naturwissenschaften 2002, 89, 338–351.
  58. Chen, J.; Mo, Q.; Sheng, R.; et al. The application of human periodontal ligament stem cells and biomimetic silk scaffold for in situ tendon regeneration. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2021, 12, 596.
  59. Moreau, J.L.; Xu, H.H. Mesenchymal stem cell proliferation and differentiation on an injectable calcium phosphate–chitosan composite scaffold. Biomaterials 2009, 30, 2675–2682.
  60. Yang, X.; Lu, Z.; Wu, H.; et al. Collagen-alginate as bioink for three-dimensional (3D) cell printing based cartilage tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2018, 83, 195–201.
  61. Bucciarelli, A.; Petretta, M.; Grigolo, B.; et al. Methacrylated silk fibroin additive manufacturing of shape memory constructs with possible application in bone regeneration. Gels 2022, 8, 833.
  62. Frączek, W.; Kotela, A.; Kotela, I.; et al. Nanostructures in Orthopedics: Advancing Diagnostics, Targeted Therapies, and Tissue Regeneration. Materials 2024, 17, 6162.
  63. Zhu, L.; Luo, D.; Liu, Y. Effect of the nano/microscale structure of biomaterial scaffolds on bone regeneration. Int. J. Oral Sci. 2020, 12, 6.
  64. Shi, S.; Shi, W.; Zhou, B.; et al. Research and Application of Chitosan Nanoparticles in Orthopedic Infections. Int. J. Nanomed. 2024, 19, 6589–6602.
  65. Zuluaga-Velez, A.; Quintero-Martinez, A.; Orozco, L.M.; et al. Silk fibroin nanocomposites as tissue engineering scaffolds–A systematic review. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021, 141, 111924.
  66. Peltier, L.F. Orthopedics: A History and Iconography; Norman Publishing: San Francisco, CA, USA, 1993.
  67. Narayanan, G.; Vernekar, V.N.; Kuyinu, E.L.; et al. Poly (lactic acid)-based biomaterials for orthopaedic regenerative engineering. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2016, 107, 247–276.
  68. Habibovic, P.; Kruyt, M.C.; Juhl, M.V.; et al. Comparative in vivo study of six hydroxyapatite-based bone graft substitutes. J. Orthop. Res. 2008, 26, 1363–1370.
  69. Rico-Llanos, G.A.; Borrego-González, S.; Moncayo-Donoso, M.; et al. Collagen type I biomaterials as scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Polymers 2021, 13, 599.
  70. Sommerich, R.; DeCelle, M.; Frasier, W.J. Mechanical Implant Material Selection, Durability, Strength, and Stiffness. In Handbook of Spine Technology; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 151–162.
  71. Wang, X. Cortical bone mechanics and composition: Effects of age and gender. In Skeletal Aging and Osteoporosis: Biomechanics and Mechanobiology; Springer Nature: Berlin, Germany, 2013; pp. 53–85.
  72. Li, Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, R.; et al. Collagen-based biomaterials for bone tissue engineering. Mater. Des. 2021, 210, 110049.
  73. Cunniffe, G.M.; O’Brien, F.J. Collagen scaffolds for orthopedic regenerative medicine. Jom 2011, 63, 66–73.
  74. Yoshii, T.; Hashimoto, M.; Egawa, S.; et al. Hydroxyapatite/collagen composite graft for posterior lumbar interbody fusion: A comparison with local bone graft. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2021, 16, 639.
  75. Noishiki, Y.; Nishiyama, Y.; Wada, M.; et al. Mechanical properties of silk fibroin–microcrystalline cellulose composite films. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2002, 86, 3425–3429.
  76. Jevotovsky, D.; Alfonso, A.; Einhorn, T.; et al. Osteoarthritis and stem cell therapy in humans: A systematic review. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2018, 26, 711–729.
  77. Akkiraju, H.; Nohe, A. Role of chondrocytes in cartilage formation, progression of osteoarthritis and cartilage regeneration. J. Dev. Biol. 2015, 3, 177–192.
  78. Wang, X.; Wang, Y.; Gou, W.; et al. Role of mesenchymal stem cells in bone regeneration and fracture repair: A review. Int. Orthop. 2013, 37, 2491–2498.
  79. Leong, N.L.; Kator, J.L.; Clemens, T.L.; et al. Tendon and ligament healing and current approaches to tendon and ligament regeneration. J. Orthop. Res. 2020, 38, 7–12.
  80. Parnia, F.; Yazdani, J.; Javaherzadeh, V.; et al. Overview of nanoparticle coating of dental implants for enhanced osseointegration and antimicrobial purposes. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2017, 20, 148–160.
  81. Güven, E. Nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems in orthopedics. Jt. Dis. Relat. Surg. 2021, 32, 267.
  82. Tracy, A.A.; Bhatia, S.K.; Ramadurai, K.W.; et al. Impact of Biomaterials on Health and Economic Development. In Bio-Based Materials as Applicable, Accessible, and Affordable Healthcare Solutions; Springer Nature: Berlin, Germany, 2018; pp. 33–41.
  83. Reddy, M.S.B.; Ponnamma, D.; Choudhary, R.; et al. A comparative review of natural and synthetic biopolymer composite scaffolds. Polymers 2021, 13, 1105.
  84. Aguado-Maestro, I.; Simón-Pérez, C.; García-Alonso, M.; et al. Clinical Applications of “In-Hospital” 3D Printing in Hip Surgery: A Systematic Narrative Review. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 599.
  85. Li, G.; Sun, S. Silk fibroin-based biomaterials for tissue engineering applications. Molecules 2022, 27, 2757.
  86. Rahimi, M.; Mir, S.M.; Baghban, R.; et al. Chitosan-based biomaterials for the treatment of bone disorders. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 215, 346–367.
  87. Reakasame, S.; Boccaccini, A.R. Oxidized alginate-based hydrogels for tissue engineering applications: A review. Biomacromolecules 2018, 19, 3–21.
  88. Kong, H.J.; Kaigler, D.; Kim, K.; et al. Controlling rigidity and degradation of alginate hydrogels via molecular weight distribution. Biomacromolecules 2004, 5, 1720–1727.
  89. Pawelec, K.; Best, S.; Cameron, R. Collagen: A network for regenerative medicine. J. Mater. Chem. B 2016, 4, 6484–6496.
  90. Malige, A.; Gates, C.; Cook, J.L. Mesenchymal stem cells in orthopaedics: A systematic review of applications to practice. J. Orthop. 2024, 58, 1–9.
  91. Lukomska, B.; Stanaszek, L.; Zuba-Surma, E.; et al. Challenges and controversies in human mesenchymal stem cell therapy. Stem Cells Int. 2019, 2019, 9628536.
  92. Aicale, R.; Tarantino, D.; Maccauro, G.; et al. Genetics in orthopaedic practice. J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents 2019, 33, 103–117.
  93. Wattanaanek, N.; Suttapreyasri, S.; Samruajbenjakun, B. 3D printing of calcium phosphate/calcium sulfate with alginate/cellulose-based scaffolds for bone regeneration: Multilayer fabrication and characterization. J. Funct. Biomater. 2022, 13, 47.
  94. Khitab, A.; Anwar, W.; Mehmood, I.; et al. Sustainable Construction with Advanced Biomaterials: An Overview. Sci. Int. 2016, 28, 2351–2356.
  95. Brown, B.N.; Badylak, S.F. Biocompatibility and immune response to biomaterials. In Regenerative Medicine Applications in Organ Transplantation; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 151–162.
  96. Delustro, F.; Dasch, J.; Keefe, J.; et al. Immune responses to allogeneic and xenogeneic implants of collagen and collagen derivatives. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1990, 260, 263–279.
  97. Saad, B.; Said, O. Greco-Arab and Islamic Herbal Medicine: Traditional System, Ethics, Safety, Efficacy, and Regulatory Issues; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011.
  98. Singh, A.V.; Chandrasekar, V.; Prabhu, V.M.; et al. Sustainable bioinspired materials for regenerative medicine: Balancing toxicology, environmental impact, and ethical considerations. Biomed. Mater. 2024, 19, 060501.
  99. Williams, D.F. Challenges with the development of biomaterials for sustainable tissue engineering. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2019, 7, 127.
  100. Dobrzański, L.A.; Hajduczek, E.; Hudecki, A. Materials Challenges in Regenerative Medicine. Polym. Nanofibers Prod. By Electrospinn. Appl. Regen. Med. 2015, 3, 12–82.
  101. Hassan, S.; Heinrich, M.; Cecen, B.; et al. Biomaterials for on-chip organ systems. In Biomaterials for Organ and Tissue Regeneration; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; p. 669.
  102. Wasyłeczko, M.; Sikorska, W.; Chwojnowski, A. Review of synthetic and hybrid scaffolds in cartilage tissue engineering. Membranes 2020, 10, 348.
  103. Sánchez-Téllez, D.A.; Téllez-Jurado, L.; Rodríguez-Lorenzo, L.M. Hydrogels for cartilage regeneration, from polysaccharides to hybrids. Polymers 2017, 9, 671.
  104. Hsu, M.-N.; Chang, Y.-H.; Truong, V.A.; et al. CRISPR technologies for stem cell engineering and regenerative medicine. Biotechnol. Adv. 2019, 37, 107447.
  105. Wong, T.M.; Jin, J.; Lau, T.W.; et al. The use of three-dimensional printing technology in orthopaedic surgery: A review. J. Orthop. Surg. 2017, 25, 4077.
  106. Dhawan, A.; Kennedy, P.M.; Rizk, E.B.; et al. Three-dimensional bioprinting for bone and cartilage restoration in orthopaedic surgery. JAAOS-J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 2019, 27, e215–e226.