Downloads

Abdellatief, T. M. M., Mustafa, A., & Duan, X. Isopropanol as a Renewable Additive in Gasoline Blends: Enhancing Octane Ratings for Sustainable Fuel Solutions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Technology. 2025. doi: Retrieved from https://w3.sciltp.com/journals/rset/article/view/2505000599
Volume 1, Issue 1, 2025
Copyright (c) 2025 by the authors.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Article

Isopropanol as a Renewable Additive in Gasoline Blends: Enhancing Octane Ratings for Sustainable Fuel Solutions

Tamer M. M. Abdellatief 1,2,*, Ahmad Mustafa 3 and Xiongbo Duan 4

1 Sustainable Energy & Power Systems Research Centre, RISE, University of Sharjah, Sharjah P.O. Box 27272, United Arab Emirates

2 Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Minia University, EL-Minia 61519, Egypt

3 Center of Excellence, October University for Modern Sciences and Arts (MSA), Giza 12566, Egypt

4 School of Energy Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China

* Correspondence: tamerabdellatief@mu.edu.eg

Received: 30 January 2025; Revised: 17 March 2025; Accepted: 21 April 2025; Published: 7 May 2025

Abstract: This study explored the effect of isopropanol on Research Octane Number (RON) and Motor Octane Number (MON) of different gasoline constituents, such as reformate, isomerate, light straight-run naphtha (LSRN), and heavy straight-run naphtha (HSRN). Considering its high intrinsic octane values, isopropanol was mixed with different volumetric concentrations of each gasoline to assess its potential as an octane booster. Using normal ASTM procedures, the RON and MON of each blend were assessed. The findings showed that the octane levels of all base fuels had significantly increased. LSRN and HSRN showed the biggest gains, while isomerate and reformate showed very modest improvements. It was discovered that adding isopropanol enhanced the mixes’ anti-knock capabilities, making them more appropriate for contemporary high-compression engines. The study also emphasizes how crucial it is to optimize blending ratios to balance the increase in octane with other gasoline characteristics like stability and volatility. The experimental results reported that fuel blends’ antidetonation performance, as determined by their octane number, varies in the following order: isopropanol > reformate > isomerate > light straight run naphtha > heavy straight run naphtha by octane number. Finally, isopropanol may be a useful and sustainable additive for raising the octane level of gasoline, improving fuel economy and lessening engine knocking.

Keywords:

isopropanol gasoline biofuels renewable additives internal combustion engine alternative fuels sustainability

References

  1. Gao, J.; Huang, J.; Li, X.; et al. Challenges of the UK government and industries regarding emission control after ICE vehicle bans. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 835, 155406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155406.
  2. Shuai, S.; Ma, X.; Li, Y.; et al. Recent Progress in Automotive Gasoline Direct Injection Engine Technology. Automot. Innov. 2018, 1, 95–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42154-018-0020-1.
  3. Hoekman, S.K. Biofuels in the U.S.—Challenges and Opportunities. Renew. Energy 2009, 34, 14–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2008.04.030.
  4. Moka, S.; Pande, M.; Rani, M.; et al. Alternative fuels: An overview of current trends and scope for future. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 32, 697–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.023.
  5. Abdellatief, T.M.M.; Ershov, M.A.; Kapustin, V.M.; et al. Low carbon energy technologies envisaged in the context of sustainable energy for producing high-octane gasoline fuel. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2023, 56, 103103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2023.103103.
  6. Cardona, C.A.; Sánchez, Ó.J. Fuel ethanol production: Process design trends and integration opportunities. Bioresour. Technol. 2007, 98, 2415–2457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.01.002.
  7. Das, L.M.; Gulati, R.; Gupta, P.K. A comparative evaluation of the performance characteristics of a spark ignition engine using hydrogen and compressed natural gas as alternative fuels. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2000, 25, 783–793. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3199(99)00103-2.
  8. Haldar, S.K.; Ghosh, B.B.; Nag, A. Utilization of unattended Putranjiva roxburghii non-edible oil as fuel in diesel engine. Renew. Energy 2009, 34, 343–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2008.03.008.
  9. Göktaş, M.; Kemal Balki, M.; Sayin, C.; et al. An evaluation of the use of alcohol fuels in SI engines in terms of performance, emission and combustion characteristics: A review. Fuel 2021, 286, 119425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119425.
  10. Thaweelap, N.; Plerdsranoy, P.; Poo-arporn, Y.; et al. Ni-doped activated carbon nanofibers for storing hydrogen at ambient temperature: Experiments and computations. Fuel 2021, 288, 119608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119608.
  11. Doğan, O. The influence of n-butanol/diesel fuel blends utilization on a small diesel engine performance and emissions. Fuel 2011, 90, 2467–2472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2011.02.033.
  12. Merola, S.S.; Valentino, G.; Tornatore, C.; et al. In-cylinder spectroscopic measurements of knocking combustion in a SI engine fuelled with butanol–gasoline blend. Energy 2013, 62, 150–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.05.056.
  13. Iodice, P.; Cardone, M. Ethanol/Gasoline Blends as Alternative Fuel in Last Generation Spark-Ignition Engines: A Review on CO and HC Engine Out Emissions. Energies 2021, 14, 4034. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14134034.
  14. Yusuf, A.A.; Inambao, F.L. Progress in alcohol-gasoline blends and their effects on the performance and emissions in SI engines under different operating conditions. Int. J. Ambient. Energy 2021, 42, 465–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/01430750.2018.1531261.
  15. Balki, M.K.; Sayin, C. The effect of compression ratio on the performance, emissions and combustion of an SI (spark ignition) engine fueled with pure ethanol, methanol and unleaded gasoline. Energy 2014, 71, 194–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.04.074.
  16. Jiao, J.; Li, J.; Bai, Y. Ethanol as a vehicle fuel in China: A review from the perspectives of raw material resource, vehicle, and infrastructure. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 180, 832–845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.141.
  17. Yang, C.-J.; Jackson, R.B. China’s growing methanol economy and its implications for energy and the environment. Energy Policy 2012, 41, 878–884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.037.
  18. Larsen, U.; Johansen, T.; Schramm, J. Ethanol as a Fuel for Road Transportation; IEA: Paris, France, 2009.
  19. dos Santos Vieira, C.F.; Maugeri Filho, F.; Maciel Filho, R.; et al. Acetone-free biobutanol production: Past and recent advances in the Isopropanol-Butanol-Ethanol (IBE) fermentation. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 287, 121425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121425.
  20. Kujawska, A.; Kujawski, J.; Bryjak, M.; et al. ABE fermentation products recovery methods—A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 48, 648–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.028.
  21. Kumar, M.; Goyal, Y.; Sarkar, A.; et al. Comparative economic assessment of ABE fermentation based on cellulosic and non-cellulosic feedstocks. Appl. Energy 2012, 93, 193–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.12.079.
  22. Oksal, I.N.; Kaymak, D.B. Design and control of a Biobutanol Purification Process through IBE Fermentation: Basic Design Configuration. In Computer Aided Chemical Engineering; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; Volume 50, pp. 1167–1172. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-88506-5.50180-7.
  23. Zhen, X.; Wang, Y.; Liu, D. Bio-butanol as a new generation of clean alternative fuel for SI (spark ignition) and CI (compression ignition) engines. Renew. Energy 2020, 147, 2494–2521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.10.119.
  24. Graham, L.A.; Belisle, S.L.; Baas, C.-L. Emissions from light duty gasoline vehicles operating on low blend ethanol gasoline and E85. Atmos. Environ. 2008, 42, 4498–4516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.01.061.
  25. Sileghem, L.; Alekseev, V.A.; Vancoillie, J.; et al. Laminar burning velocity of gasoline and the gasoline surrogate components iso-octane, n-heptane and toluene. Fuel 2013, 112, 355–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.05.049.
  26. Veloo, P.S.; Wang, Y.L.; Egolfopoulos, F.N.; et al. A comparative experimental and computational study of methanol, ethanol, and n-butanol flames. Combust. Flame 2010, 157, 1989–2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2010.04.001.
  27. Iliev, S. Investigation of the Gasoline Engine Performance and Emissions Working on Methanol-Gasoline Blends Using Engine Simulation. In Numerical and Experimental Studies on Combustion Engines and Vehicles; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2020. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.92858.
  28. MAN Energy Solutions. The Methanolfuelled MAN B&W LGIM Engine; MAN Energy Solutions: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2014.
  29. Dutta, A. Forecasting ethanol market volatility: New evidence from the corn implied volatility index. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefining 2019, 13, 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1931.
  30. Wallner, T.; Ickes, A.; Lawyer, K. Analytical Assessment of C2–C8 Alcohols as Spark-Ignition Engine Fuels. In Proceedings of the FISITA 2012 World Automotive Congress, Beijing, China, 27–30 November 2012; pp. 15–26.
  31. Veloo, P.S.; Egolfopoulos, F.N. Studies of n-propanol, iso-propanol, and propane flames. Combust. Flame 2011, 158, 501–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2010.10.001.
  32. Rochón, E.; Cortizo, G.; Cabot, M.I.; et al. Bioprocess intensification for isopropanol, butanol and ethanol (IBE) production by fermentation from sugarcane and sweet sorghum juices through a gas stripping-pervaporation recovery process. Fuel 2020, 281, 118593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118593.
  33. Pyrgakis, K.A.; de Vrije, T.; Budde, M.A.W.; et al. A process integration approach for the production of biological iso-propanol, butanol and ethanol using gas stripping and adsorption as recovery methods. Biochem. Eng. J. 2016, 116, 176–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2016.07.014.
  34. Liu, Y.; Xu, B.; Jia, J.; et al. Effect of Injection Timing on Performance and Emissions of DI-diesel Engine Fueled with Isopropanol. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Mechatronics, Phuket, Thailand, 20–21 December 2015; pp. 133–137. https://doi.org/10.2991/iceem-15.2015.33.
  35. Li, G.; Lee, T.H.; Zhang, C. Optical investigation on impacts of component ratio on spray, combustion and flame structure of isopropanol-butanol-ethanol (IBE)/diesel blends. Fuel 2020, 280, 118602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118602.
  36. Alptekin, E. Evaluation of ethanol and isopropanol as additives with diesel fuel in a CRDI diesel engine. Fuel 2017, 205, 161–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.05.076.
  37. Iliev, S.; Ivanov, Z.; Dimitrov, R.; et al. An Experimental Investigation into the Performance and Emission Characteristics of a Gasoline Direct Injection Engine Fueled with Isopropanol Gasoline Blends. Machines 2023, 11, 1062. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines11121062.
  38. Zhang, P.; Su, X.; Chen, H.; et al. Experimental investigation on NOx and PM pollutions of a common-rail diesel engine fueled with diesel/gasoline/isopropanol blends. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2019, 3, 2260–2274. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9SE00209J.
  39. Gainey, B.; Yan, Z.; Moser, S.; et al. Lean flammability limit of high-dilution spark ignition with ethanol, propanol, and butanol. Int. J. Engine Res. 2021, 23, 638–648. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468087421993256.
  40. Sivasubramanian, H.; Pochareddy, Y.K.; Dhamodaran, G.; et al. Performance, emission and combustion characteristics of a branched higher mass, C3 alcohol (isopropanol) blends fuelled medium duty MPFI SI engine. Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J. 2017, 20, 528–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2016.11.013.
  41. Awad, O.I.; Mamat, R.; Ali, O.M.; et al. Alcohol and ether as alternative fuels in spark ignition engine: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 82, 2586–2605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.074.
  42. Monteiro, M.R.; Ambrozin, A.R.P.; Santos, A.O.; et al. Evaluation of metallic corrosion caused by alcohol fuel and some contaminants. Mater. Sci. Forum 2010, 636, 1024–1029. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.636-637.1024.
  43. Muthuraman, V.S.; Patel, A.; Shreya, V.; et al. Progress on compatibility issues of alcohols on automotive materials: Kinetics, challenges and future prospects- a comprehensive review. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2022, 162, 463–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2022.04.022.
  44. Ambrozin, A.R.P.; Monteiro, M.R.; Santos, A.O.; et al. Evaluation of galvanic corrosion of a Zn alloy in alcohol fuel. Fuel Process. Technol. 2010, 91, 1687–1690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.07.005.